Socialists and wars in the 21st century – The case of Syria
Posted by Editor on Saturday, December 3, 2016 · Leave a Comment

Richard Fidler,
Links.
In Syria the rebel cities that rose up four years ago in revolt against the brutal Assad dictatorship are now under a genocidal siege, bombed and assaulted from the air by Assad’s military aided and abetted by Russian fighter jets and bombers. Their desperate fight for survival, if unsuccessful, will put paid to the Arab Spring and with it the potential for building a democratic, anti-imperialist governmental alternative in the Middle East for an extended period to come. Socialists and antiwar activists everywhere have every interest in supporting the Syrian people and opposing that war.
But where is the antiwar movement? And what if anything is it doing about Syria? The most recent statement on the Canadian Peace Alliance web site is headlined Stop Bombing Syria. But it is focused on NATO. Not wrong in principle, but the statement, addressed to Canada’s previous bombing of ISIS positions in Syria, is many months out of date. There is nothing on the CPA site about the current murderous air and bombing assault on Syria’s cities. And it would appear that across the country the movement is doing nothing to protest the war.
Why the silence? Is it only because Trudeau has pulled Canada’s fighter jets out of Syria; after all, Canadian planes and troops are active in other parts of the Middle East. The CPA denounces the bombing of Syria by Harper and Trudeau but says nothing about the bombing now by Putin. And most of the left and labour movement are likewise maintaining a disquieting silence on the war in Syria.
Part of the reason lies no doubt in the complex and confused situation on the ground in that country, and throughout the Middle East.
In Syria the Assad regime has from the outset responded with brutal repression, displaying no willingness to negotiate with the democratic and popular opposition forces. It has sought to deflect attention from its war by various tactics, including the release from its prisons of Islamic fundamentalists who are now fighting with Daesh, the reactionary Islamic State forces that have been drawn into Syria from Iraq as a result of the civil war.
Iran and now Russia have intervened in support of Assad, while traditional allies of the United States (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Jordan, with the obvious sympathy of Israel) have backed the opposition, although for their own reactionary purposes and without providing the opposition forces with the weapons and other material support they so desperately need.
The United States, no friend of Assad but fearing his overthrow will further destabilize the Middle East and jeopardize Israel’s defense, has doled out aid to the opposition as if through an eye-dropper, denying it the necessary anti-aircraft and anti-tank weapons to ward off the regime’s bombing of the dissident cities.
Category: Analysis, Imperialism/colonialism, Refugees, Syria · Tags: civil war, Debate, Iran, Middle East, Russia, socialists, Syria, Syrian opposition, USA, war, war on terror
Topics
- Afghanistan
- Analysis
- Arabian Peninsula
- Arabic
- Armenia
- Art
- Azerbaijan
- Book review
- Central Asia
- Democracy
- Economics
- Egypt
- Environment
- Ethnicity
- Farsi
- Globalalisation/global
- Health
- History
- Human rights
- Imperialism/colonialism
- Interview
- Iran
- Iraq
- Islamism
- Israel
- Kurdistan
- Language
- Lebanon
- Literature
- Magazine
- Marxism
- Media
- Middle East
- Movements
- North Africa
- Obituary
- Palestine
- Poetry
- protest
- Racism
- Refugees
- Report
- Repression
- Resistance
- Revolution
- Saudi Arabia
- Syria
- Turkey
- UAR
- War
- Women
- Workers
- Yemen